Decode Civils CAShorts
PolityPrelimsGS2

Supreme Court directs MeitY to curb misuse of live-streamed court hearings

By CAShorts DeskPublished Source: The Hindu; The Indian Express; PIB (Ministry of Electronics and IT, 2021)

Supreme Court directs MeitY to curb misuse of live-streamed court hearings
Illustration (AI-generated)

On 30 October 2026 the Supreme Court told MeitY, the Union ministry for electronics and IT, to enforce its interim bar on unauthorised use of live-streamed court proceedings. The policy the Centre is drafting must provide for action against violators. Justice Joymalya Bagchi said in court that authorities under the intermediary rules must act at once on breaches.

Syllabus: Prelims · Polity & Governance; GS2 · Executive & Judiciary; GS2 · Governance & e-Governance

Why this matters for UPSC

GS2 judiciary and governance, GS3 digital platforms. Prelims can ask about the IT Rules, 2021 and safe harbour; Mains, open justice versus misuse of court footage.

Why it matters

A litigant whose words in a hearing are clipped, recaptioned and posted for views can suffer long after the case is over. People who see such a clip also learn a false version of what the judges did. Streaming was meant to let ordinary citizens watch justice at work, so misuse undercuts the reason for opening courts at all. If edited footage keeps spreading for profit, judges may hesitate to stream more hearings. Making the Ministry and the platforms act on breaches keeps the feed open while stopping its abuse. Reporters can still cover hearings, but a creator who wants to reuse footage will first need the court's permission.

Prelims pointers

  • The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 were framed under the Information Technology Act, 2000, replacing the Intermediary Guidelines Rules of 2011.
  • Part II of the 2021 Rules, on intermediaries, is run by MeitY; Part III, the digital media code of ethics, by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.
  • Under the 2021 Rules, a Grievance Officer acknowledges a user's complaint within 24 hours and resolves it within 15 days.
  • The 2021 Rules split platforms into social media intermediaries and significant social media intermediaries by a user threshold the Government notifies; the larger ones carry additional duties.
  • Intermediaries must remove content showing a person's private areas or morphed images within 24 hours of a complaint, which another person may file on the victim's behalf.

Practise a UPSC-style question

With reference to the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, consider the following statements:

1. Part III of the Rules, the code of ethics for digital media, is administered by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.

2. The Rules were framed under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and replaced the intermediary guidelines of 2011.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a) 1 only
  2. (b) 2 only
  3. (c) Both 1 and 2
  4. (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Show the answer

Answer: (b) 2 only

Answer: (b) 2 only. The parent law is right; the ministry for Part III is wrong.

Statement 1: incorrect. Part III, the code of ethics and safeguards for digital media, is administered by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting; MeitY runs Part II.

Statement 2: correct. The 2021 Rules were made under the Information Technology Act, 2000, superseding the Intermediary Guidelines Rules of 2011.

Eliminate: Statement 2 is the parent-law fact and is surely true. Out: (a), (d).

Eliminate: Statement 1 gives Part III to the wrong ministry. Out: (c).

Trap: Swapped attribution. Two ministries share the 2021 Rules, so the question pins the digital media part on MeitY, which handles only the intermediary part.

Remember: Platforms: MeitY (Part II). Digital news and OTT ethics: Information and Broadcasting (Part III).

More from the 1 November 2026 edition

All stories of 1 November 2026

More Polity current affairs