UP orders re-check of electoral roll entries fed by computer assistants
Uttar Pradesh's Chief Electoral Officer has ordered verification of all Form 6, 7 and 8 entries fed by computer assistants since the post-SIR final electoral roll of 10 April 2026. Only booth-level officers may now digitise physical forms, through the BLO App. Officials were warned of action under section 32, Representation of the People Act, 1950.
Syllabus: Prelims · Polity & Governance; GS2 · Representation of the People Act; GS2 · Constitutional Bodies
Why this matters for UPSC
GS2, Representation of the People Act and constitutional bodies. Prelims can ask what section 32 punishes, what a Chief Electoral Officer does under section 13A and what Forms 6, 7 and 8 are for; Mains, about safeguards against wrongful deletion.
Why it matters
A voter whose details are wrongly changed, or whose name is struck off, may find out only at the polling booth. By then the roll cannot be changed for that election, since corrections stop at the last date for nominations. Who types an entry therefore matters: a booth-level officer is a named official who can be traced and held answerable, while a shared login leaves no one accountable. Re-checking months of entries before the summary revision's draft roll gives such voters a chance to object in time. Karnataka shows the wider risk to the right to vote. When the same officials raise objections and decide them, and leave the reason blank, a voter cannot know why a name went or contest it.
Prelims pointers
- Section 32, RP Act, 1950: breach of roll duty without reasonable cause is punishable with imprisonment of three months to two years, and a fine.
- Section 31, RP Act, 1950: a false written declaration in roll work, made without believing it true, draws up to one year in jail, or a fine, or both.
- Section 13CC: CEOs, DEOs, EROs and other roll and election staff are deemed on deputation to the Election Commission, under its control and discipline, while so employed.
- Rule 13, 1960 Rules: Form 6 claims inclusion as a new elector; Form 7, by someone on that roll, objects or seeks deletion; Form 8 corrects or shifts an entry.
- Rule 17: the registration officer must reject any claim or objection lodged after the set period, or not in the set form and manner.
- Rule 21A: before final publication, the registration officer lists names proposed for deletion, gives notice and weighs objections, making every endeavour to let those held non-resident or ineligible show cause.
- Section 22: an ERO may correct or delete an entry after inquiry, but must hear the person first, except when the ground is death.
- Section 24: an ERO's order under section 22 or 23 is appealable to the district magistrate or equivalent within 15 days, then to the CEO within 30 days (Rule 27).
Practise a UPSC-style question
With reference to the officers who prepare electoral rolls under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, consider the following statements:
1. A State's Chief Electoral Officer is an officer of Government designated or nominated by the Election Commission in consultation with the State Government.
2. An electoral registration officer is appointed by the State Government on the recommendation of the Chief Electoral Officer.
3. An assistant electoral registration officer may perform all or any of the functions of the electoral registration officer, subject to the latter's control.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- (a) 1 and 2 only
- (b) 2 and 3 only
- (c) 1 and 3 only
- (d) 1, 2 and 3
Show the answer
Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only
Answer: (c) 1 and 3 only. The Election Commission, not the State Government, designates both the CEO and the ERO.
Statement 1: correct. Section 13A of the RP Act, 1950: the CEO is an officer of Government designated or nominated by the Election Commission in consultation with the State Government.
Statement 2: incorrect. Section 13B: the ERO is an officer of Government or of a local authority designated or nominated by the Election Commission, in consultation with the State Government.
Statement 3: correct. Section 13C: an AERO, appointed by the Election Commission, may perform all or any of the ERO's functions, subject to the ERO's control.
Eliminate: Statement 2 is wrong because the Election Commission, not the State Government, designates the ERO. Out: (a), (b), (d).
Trap: Swapped attribution. The State Government is consulted, so it feels like the appointing authority; the power to designate the ERO lies with the Election Commission.
Remember: The CEO, DEO and ERO are all designated by the Election Commission, in consultation with the State Government.
Explainers on this topic
More from the 26 October 2026 edition
- Operation Trident: NCB-led raids and PMLA action hit Myanmar-linked narco-hawala network National
- Oil spill off UAE shuts beaches: MARPOL, OPRC and IOPC Funds Environment
- RBI opens Bhubaneswar Data Centre for RTGS, NEFT and cybersecurity institute Economy
- Cyclone Arnab: Andhra Pradesh announces evacuations; NDRF, State forces deployed National
- Film certifier CBFC probes alleged leak from its e-Cinepramaan portal Polity
- Andhra Pradesh notifies polls in Kotia villages Odisha claims: inter-State boundary disputes Polity
- OBC creamy layer: Centre awaits SC directions to allocate 958 selectees Polity
- Section 163 BNSS curbs in Pasighat after Siang dam violence; RAF sent Polity
- IITM's new lab under Mission Mausam to trace Delhi-NCR pollution sources Environment
- Keralam ex-Governor reportedly recommended PSC chief's removal: how Article 317 works Polity