Decode Civils CAShorts
Current affairs Open app
ExplainerPolityPrelimsGS2

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967: terror law, designation and bail

By CAShorts DeskPublished Updated Sources: the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and its 2019 amendment (Gazette of India); PRS Legislative Research; ETV Bharat; Scroll.in; Free Press Journal

Why in news: Reported 10 October 2026: the National Investigation Agency registered an FIR under the Anti-Hijacking Act, 2016 and sections 16, 18 and 20 of the UAPA.

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967: terror law, designation and bail
Illustration (AI-generated)

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) is India's main anti-terror law. It punishes unlawful activity and terrorist acts, lets the Central Government list terrorist organisations and individuals, allows up to 180 days of custody during investigation and restricts bail under section 43D(5). The National Investigation Agency invoked it in an FIR reported on 10 October 2026.

Syllabus: Prelims · Polity & Governance; GS2 · Executive & Judiciary; GS3 · External Threats to Security

In short

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 is India's main anti-terror law; it lets the Centre designate terrorists and restricts bail, setting national security against personal liberty.

Key provisions of theUAPATerrorist act,section 15Designation,section 35Custody, section43D(2)Bail bar, section43D(5)Sanction filter,section 45

The UAPA's reach against terror is needed, but with 335 convictions from 10,440 arrests, faster trials must stop the bail bar becoming punishment.

Why it matters

A person arrested under the UAPA can spend years in jail before the trial ends. Investigators get up to 180 days to finish the probe, against 60 or 90 days under ordinary criminal law, and a court must refuse bail if the case diary or the police report makes the accusation look true on its face. A person named in the Fourth Schedule is listed as a terrorist by a government notification, before any trial, and must apply to the same government to be removed. The larger issue is the balance between national security and personal liberty, including the right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The question referred in May 2026 for a larger Bench is how far a delayed trial can override the bail bar.

Prelims pointers

  • Unlawful activity, section 2(1)(o): an act or words supporting cession or secession, disrupting India's sovereignty and territorial integrity, or causing disaffection against India.
  • Unlawful association: declared by the Central Government under section 3 of the Act; a Tribunal headed by a High Court judge must confirm the declaration.
  • Terrorist act, section 15: includes acts striking terror in any foreign country and offences under the treaties listed in the Second Schedule.
  • Section 43D: every offence under the Act is cognizable, and anticipatory bail is not available to a person accused under it.
  • Section 43: Chapter IV and VI offences are investigated by a Deputy Superintendent or Assistant Commissioner of Police or above; since 2019, also by National Investigation Agency Inspectors and above.
  • K A Najeeb (2021), a three-judge Supreme Court Bench: long incarceration can justify bail despite section 43D(5), given the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.
  • Constitution (Sixteenth Amendment) Act, 1963: Article 19 freedoms of speech, assembly and association may be restricted for India's sovereignty and integrity; the UAPA followed in 1967.
  • The National Investigation Agency, set up under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, is a central agency that can investigate offences under the UAPA across States.

Practise a UPSC-style question

With reference to the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, consider the following statements:

1. The power to add an organisation to the First Schedule of the Act as a terrorist organisation rests with the State Government concerned.

2. Since an amendment made in 2019, an individual can be designated a terrorist by adding the name to the Fourth Schedule of the Act.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  1. (a) 1 only
  2. (b) 2 only
  3. (c) Both 1 and 2
  4. (d) Neither 1 nor 2
Show the answer

Answer: (b) 2 only

1 is incorrect: under section 35 the Central Government, not a State Government, adds an organisation to the First Schedule by notification. 2 is correct: the 2019 amendment created the Fourth Schedule for the names of individuals designated as terrorists.

More Explainers

All Explainers

More Polity current affairs